A
React Native
Shared business logic, TypeScript, reuse with a React website team, native modules where a device API is the product. New Architecture when the libraries you need support it. Best when your people already think in React.
Cross-platform
React Native app development is the right call when you want shared business logic, a native-feeling UI, and a team that already speaks TypeScript and React. CodeLoop Studio ships React Native alongside Flutter and native Swift/Kotlin — we recommend the stack after we see the features, not because we only have one hammer. Studio in Sarajevo; English with US, UK, and EU product teams.
You have a React web app or a JS-heavy team. You need native modules for a device API but not a fully custom rendering engine. You want one release train for both stores. That is when React Native is honest. Flutter may still win if the UI system should be fully custom and Dart is welcome. Native wins when you are building something that must feel like a first-party iOS or Android app. We will say which of those you are. The studio stack includes Swift/SwiftUI, Kotlin/Jetpack Compose, Flutter, React Native, and Next.js. RN is one option when the team and product fit — not a religion because it is on this URL.
TypeScript from day one. New Architecture when the libraries you need support it — we will not stall a launch on a migration that does not unlock a feature. Native bridges only where the product requires them. CI builds, signing, listings, and review notes included in the plan. Device QA on phones. Calendar still sits in the 3–9 month band for a real product. A focused React Native MVP can be shorter. Framework choice is secondary to frozen scope.
Embedding a senior in your repo is the hire-developer path. This page is a scoped product: discovery through both stores. We would rather stabilize an existing RN app and ship features than rewrite you into Flutter for a blog post. Rewrites are expensive. Studio in Sarajevo. English with US, UK, and EU product teams. Send the first loop.
A
Shared business logic, TypeScript, reuse with a React website team, native modules where a device API is the product. New Architecture when the libraries you need support it. Best when your people already think in React.
B
One visual system, Dart, custom painting, less reuse with a React website. We pick it when we control the pixels and a shared JS ecosystem is not the constraint. Cost still follows scope, not the logo on the framework.
TypeScript from day one
Shared types beat a JavaScript surprise in month four. The commercial engagement is a studio, not a stack sermon.
Bridges on purpose
Native code when the API is the product, not as a default. We will not wrap every OS feature “just in case.”
New Architecture when it is real
When the libraries you need support it. We will not stall a launch on a migration that does not unlock a feature.
CI, signing, listings
Review notes in the plan. Store pipeline is part of delivery — see also custom mobile app development.
Device QA
Phones, not only simulators. Launch-week bugs are cheaper in staging.
Join an existing repo
Often the hire-developer path. If you want a milestone owned end-to-end, this landing is the better brief.
Rewrites are expensive. We would rather stabilize and ship features unless the current stack is blocking you. Calendar still sits in the 3–9 month band for a real product. Framework choice is secondary to frozen scope.
If every workshop must be a React Native migration, say so. If you need iOS-perfect chrome, say so. We also ship Swift, Kotlin, Flutter, and Next.js. RN is one option when the team and product fit — not a religion we sell because it is on this URL.
You want a slice shipped, not a seat filled
Discovery through stores. Named owner. Written status.
You already think in React — or you do not, and you need a no
We will recommend Flutter or native if RN is a poor fit. That is the job.
You can name the first loop
Send it through the estimate form. Range in 24 hours.
Related